137 posts tagged terfs

Contrapoints explains why J.K. Rowling’s transphobia is bigotry

Contrapoints AKA Natalie Wynn has published a new video where she explains why the language used by JK Rowling and other TERFs is deceptive and bigoted.

image

But she is also able to explain why people like J.K. ends up where they are, in spite of all their arguments about being trans friendly, and she uses humor and compassion to do so.

Contrapoints explains how they tend to generalize on the basis of their own life experiences, and because of that miss so much of transgender diversity and real transgender lives.

She also explains how bigots may hide their bigotry by presenting themselves as victims, appealing to “common sense” in the process. Here is one screenshot summing-up her analysis of what she calls “Indirect bigotry”:

image

She also looks into how transgender activists may go over board in their aggression against transphobes, while at the same time explaining why it makes sense that they do so. 

This is what I truly like about Natalie: She boldly goes where angels fear to thread, using her philosophical skills to make sense out of a complex and controversial field in the process.

The transgender struggle is a political struggle, Contrapoints explains. All the TERF arguments about biological sex and bathrooms are simply diversions aimed at make people forget about this being about acceptance and justice.

Do watch the video! It is definitely worth the time.

TERF attacks against transgender people are hurting butch lesbian women

image

Trans-exclusionary “radical feminists” or TERFs often argue that transgender people threaten to destroy lesbian culture and that trans people are a threat to cis women in public spaces.

No and no. None of this is true. What is true, however, is that the unholy alliance of TERFs and right wing extremists is threatening transmasculine or “butch” trans women.

Many of them report an increase in harassment in public spaces because of the current anti-trans hysteria, and this especially applies to public restrooms.

i News argues that the story about a butch lesbian who has been threatened, assaulted and intimidated while using the women’s bathroom is warning of the growing attacks on gender non-conforming people using public toilets.

They write:

Eloise Stonborough, 32, who presents as butch – a woman whose gender expression and traits present as typically ‘masculine’ – said she is challenged on using a women’s toilet roughly every one in three times she uses a public facility, with the attacks increasing significantly over the last two years.

Stonborough, who is the Associate Director of Policy and Research at the LGBTQA organization Stonewall, said the attempts to ban trans women from public bathrooms h is causing problems for all women who don’t present as feminine.

“I think there’s been tens of times someone has questioned me using the women’s toilet, and ten of those experiences have been particularly frightening – and they’re just the ones I can remember…

I have developed behaviours to minimise the risk of going into a toilet and facing abuse. If I’m going into public, you know, shared toilet rather than a single store. I’ll often try and bring my girlfriend with me or a friend with me, someone who will clarify my gender by standing next to me…

I’m pretty socially confident and know who I am, but it’s incredibly frightening. I have to run through the mental checklist of ‘Am I in physical danger? Is this person going to move from verbal aggression physical aggression?’ if I use the loo. I have no illusions about my safety as a queer person.

Experiences like mine do end up undermining your confidence. This affects all gender-diverse people out there, who are at risk of withdrawing from public life because they cannot use the toilet without worrying about abuse, which I think is a huge tragedy….

I find it incredibly upsetting that this is a fight that is meant to be about my rights, and some sort of desire to save lesbians, as if we are going extinct… In practice it is making my life harder is making the life of my friends and my colleagues in my community, it’s making the lives of LBT women harder, in particular for butch and gender non-confirming people…

There… is absolutely no reason to make that an attack on the rights of trans people because they are part of my community, and part of our community, and our fight is a shared fight.”

Read the whole article here.

Photo of Eloise from i.

International Health Organizations Support Treatments for Transgender Kids

image

The directors of multiple medical organisations that study transgender health and gender dysphoria have released a joint statement calling for the UK Bell vs Tavistock High Court decision in the United Kingdom to be appealed.

The High Court has made it hard for transgender kids to get access to puberty blockers. The blockers give transgender children time to consider their gender identities without having the hormone rush of puberty change their bodies before they are old enough to make a final decision regarding their gender identity.

On December 1, 2020, the London High Court ruled that children are unable  to consent to taking puberty blockers. All applicants for gender affirming medical intervention in the UK under the age of 16 must first seek authorization from a court to be able to access puberty blockers.

The Boards of Directors of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), the European Association for Transgender Health (EPATH), the United States Professional Association for Transgender health (USPATH), the Asian Association for Transgender Health (AsiaPATH), the Canadian Association for Transgender Health (CPATH), the Australian Professional Association for Trans Health (AusPATH), and the Professional Association for Transgender Health Aotearoa (PATHA) all strongly disagree with the  judgment.

They write:

Treatment of transgender adolescents involving gender affirming medical interventions (puberty suppression and subsequent gender affirming hormones) is the most widely accepted and preferred clinical approach in health services for transgender people around the world. 

The aim of puberty suppression is to prevent the psychological suffering which stems from undesired physical changes that occur during puberty, and to allow the adolescent time to carefully consider whether or not to pursue further transition when they are eligible. 

It is part of the two main international guidelines: the WPATH’s Standards of Care as well as the Endocrine Society’s Clinical Practice Guidelines. To be effective, this treatment must commence early in the puberty process, not at the age of 16. When treatment is needed, its effectiveness will be diminished while waiting to be seen by a court of law…

We have a grave concern that the High Court has overlooked not only the immediate positive effects of puberty suppression, which has been demonstrated to result in decreased psychological suffering and a healthier adolescent development, but also the lifelong benefits of having a physical appearance which is congruent with one’s gender identity. 

Withholding such treatment until adolescents are 16 years old means they will experience complete puberty incongruent with their gender identity, which has potential life-long harmful consequences such as stigmatization, personal physical discomfort, difficulty with sexual function and social integration. 

The court’s decision is just one in a long line of attempts to stop trans and queer youth from becoming themselves and live happy lives. These people pretend that they care for trans kids, but their main objective is to force these kids to accept their assigned gender and live up to the binary. This is clearly demonstrated by the fact that this policy has no support among health professionals who know something about gender dysphoria and transgender people.

You can read the whole statement here.

Illustration by Arusyak Pivazyan

Influential Australian gay male activist explains why being LGBT and trying to exclude trans people makes no sense

image

There are some anti-transgender lesbian, gay and bisexual activists around. They represents a tiny minority of the LGBTQA community, but they do make a lot of noise. 

In Australia  long-time LGBTQA advocate, Rodney Croome has addressed the trans-exclusionary  LGB Aliiance’s arrival down under through this open letter: 

I am a gay man who has fought for LGBTIQ equality for three decades.

I have seen cycles of prejudice against LGBTIQ people and between us.

My hope is this letter will convince the LGB Alliance to stop perpetuating these cycles, and help break them.

The LGB Alliance says trans and gender diverse people are not part of our community, that gender activism threatens vulnerable LGB people and that gender theory threatens our very identity.

I don’t see it that way. Trans and gender diverse people aren’t just our friends and family members, they are members of our rainbow community, they are allies in our struggle for freedom and equality and we in theirs.

Why? Because, like us, they don’t fit what cultural tradition and religious dogma insist a man or a woman should be.

Like us, they are made to feel shame about their “deviance” from traditional gender roles.

Like us, they struggle with a truth about themselves that can be denied or hidden but always at great cost.

Like us, they decide to reveal that truth and come out knowing others will fear and hate them, but hoping they will find affirmation and equality.

Like us, they are attacked as a threat to society by traditionalists, authoritarians, misogynists and all manner of haters who think they are an easy target.

Like us, they reach out to the broader community in an effort to foster acceptance.

Like us, they crave the safety and empowerment of a like-minded, diverse, creative and supportive community.

If you’re unconvinced we share a common struggle, just consider the remarkably similar myths and stereotypes that are thrown at all of us.

Same-sex attraction has been dismissed as a phase, a choice or “a feeling”.

LGB people have been accused of sexualising young people, and recruiting them into a miserable, sterile, unnatural life they would later regret and from which they can escape.

LGB people have been portrayed as a threat to faith, family and even feminism (because gay men were “posing” as victims of patriarchy and because the accusation of “lesbianism” was a weapon against feminists).

We have been labelled as radicals and authoritarians just for wanting to be treated equally.

Every single one of these slurs against LGB people has been revived and thrown at trans and gender diverse folk.

As LGB people we should stand against these old stereotypes, not reiterate them. If we allow them any quarter, how long will it be before they are again turned on us?

The same goes for building up our inclusive and diverse LGBTIQ community, not dividing and weakening it.

I remember when some gay men dismissed forming a coalition with lesbians because “they hate men but we love them”.

And when bisexual people were dismissed by gay men and lesbians because “they can adopt straight respectability any time they want”.

We overcame those balkanising views to form a community that is stronger for its diversity and inclusiveness.

Rejecting trans and gender diverse folk because “we have different struggles” not only excludes people who need our support and with whom we have great commonality, it weakens our community by homogenising it.

There’s also nothing new about social theory that some people fear will “erase” us.

For a century and a half LGB people have theorised an end to LGB identity.

That end could be through a utopian sexual liberation of everyone’s “polymorphous perversity”, or through the eradication of prejudice and our integration into a heterosexual world where pride is redundant.

Theories about the end of sex and gender are, at heart, no different.

We don’t have to agree with them, but it is hypocritical for us to see some as more threatening to our identity than others.

If there is one ethic the oppression of LGB people should have taught us it is to see others as we want to be seen: not as an abstract idea, not as a projection of others’ fears, but as human beings with the same aspirations and anxieties as everyone else.

When we see trans and gender diverse folk as people first what we see are fellow humans whose experience of prejudice and aspiration for acceptance is just like ours.

Trans and gender diverse people have stood by LGB people for decades, at Stonewall, at the first Mardi Gras, at Salamanca Market and at every protest and celebration since.

We must continue to stand with them, especially now when they are under greater attack than ever.

Anything less is a betrayal of our own long struggle.

I extend an invitation to you to sit down with me and a trans advocate to talk through our concerns and yours.

Rodney Croome

Via Out in Perth. (Emphasis is ours)

Rodney Peter Croome is an Australian LGBT rights activist and academic. He worked on the campaign to decriminalise homosexuality in Tasmania, was a founder of Australian Marriage Equality, and currently serves as the spokesperson for the Tasmanian Gay and Lesbian Rights Group  and a spokesperson for Just.Equal. More here. 

Photo pf Rodney Crome by Australian Human Rights Commission.

Olivia Colman, Jameela Jamil and Paloma Faith lead feminists forcefully condemning violence against trans women

image

The movie stars are among a group of feminists who have made it clear, in an open letter of solidarity, that they support transgender women.

“Our firm belief is that an end to violence against women and girls will only be possible with the full might of the sisterhood working together – and so our feminism is against any and all violence, against any and all women,” the open letter says.

“Those who use hostile, crude or mocking language towards trans women, demeaning their bodies, and refusing to accept that they are who they say they are, contribute to the culture which creates those discriminatory disparities,  a culture which de-humanises trans women and girls thereby legitimising prejudice and violence against them.

"Those people, many of them in high places of fame, wealth and power, absolutely do not speak for us.

"Our firm belief is that an end to violence against women and girls will only be possible with the full might of the sisterhood working together – and so our feminism is against any and all violence, against any and all women.  

The letter comes in response to the hate crimes committed by the trans-exclusionary radical feminists  (”TERFs”) who are currently poisoning the transgender debate in Britain.

Pink News has more. See also The Independent.

Literary giant Margaret Atwood shuts down transphobes in Times interview

image

Pink News reports on Margaret Atwood (of Handmad’s Tale fame) giving her full support to transgender women in an interview in the right wing British newspaper The Times.

She says:

“The most bothersome thing about me is that I’m a strict agnostic.

By which I mean there’s a difference between belief and fact. And you should not confuse the two.

You can believe all you like that trans people aren’t people, but it happens not to be a fact. It is not true that there are only two boxes. So the two questions to ask about anything are: Is it true? And is it fair?

So if it’s not true that there are only two gender boxes and gender is fixed and immutable, then is it fair to treat trans people as if they’re not who they say they are?”

After the interview, the Handmaid’s Tale author sent journalist Bryan Appleyard a video dismantling JK Rowling’s TERF trans views, and an article from The Scientific American on “why the new science of sex and gender matters for everyone”.

Pink News adds that less than 24 hours after publishing the interview with Atwood, The Times deleted the story from its website. To be fair, though, the interview is now back up.

In an interview with Teen Vogue back in 2017 Atwood had this to say about the the right wing extremists’ fear of transgender people, referring to the Patriarchal dystopia of The Handmaid’s Tale book and TV series:

Gender treachery. That’s what they’re getting Ofglen for in the TV series. And there are people writing this stuff, now! Now they’re doing it! It’s about transgender people mostly, and they don’t exactly call it treachery, but they’re having none of it. You saw what the Trump administration did [to repeal trans people’s protections]. And if you want a take on why people get so popped up about it, it’s because it challenges their roles. So if there’s somebody who can change from being a man to a woman or a woman to a man, what does that make them? From whence derives their authority? When things are so wobbly, it makes them very insecure.

Back in October Atwood, together  with Stephen King, Neil Gaiman, NK Jemisin and  other American and Canadian writers., signed a letter giving full support to transgender people.

image

Conversion therapy stopped him from transitioning for decades

image

Let me make this clear from the very beginning: Conversion therapy does not work. 

As far as transgender people go: If you have consistently experienced a misalignment between your assigned gender and you experienced gender over  a longer period of time, you can be confident that that identity is an unavoidable and essential part of who you are. It cannot be removed.  The same applies to sexual orientation.

They are not helping 

In spite of this you will find parents and partners and other “friends” and “peers” who are so afraid of the stigma attached to being trans or gay that they are willing to do anything to “help” people become cis or straight. 

Make no mistake about it: They are mostly doing this to help themselves, not you. They fear the social exclusion and embarrassment that they think will follow from having a queer family member. 

Alternatively: The gender binary is such an essential part of their world view and  tribal identity that they do not dare question it. This applies, for instance, to “gender critical” TERFs and religious fanatics.

To the extent there is an ounce of good will here, it is often based on the horrible logical error that it is better to suffer in the closet than to live your real life out in the open. 

In this day and age that is rarely true, and the transphobia and homophobia that drive conversion therapy supporters only make life worse for all LGBTQA people.

Fight for your life!

This means that if anyone tries to get you to undergo conversion therapy, do everything you can to stop them. You may be fighting for your life. Literally! 

Seek out real friends, Find a pro-queer therapists. Contact LGBTQA organizations in your neighborhood. Do everything you can, because conversion therapy is true evil.

How Jules was forced into conversion therapy

In an article over at Xtra Canadian trans man Jules Sherred tells a story about pressure to conform that is far too typical:

My parents never provided any clarity. I would get physically punished for any signs of gender nonconformity, so I didn’t feel safe asking them questions. As a young child, I became convinced that the lie my sister and I made up about me being intersex was true. I needed it to be, so that there would be some sort of “normal” explanation for the way I felt.

Leaving this dysfunctional family he lived through a period of homelessness, experiencing sexual assault. He was offered foster care on the condition that he underwent regular therapy.

Every few weeks, my therapist would ask me how I was feeling about my body, and I’d have to admit I still felt dysphoric. When I did, he would guilt me, questioning why I let myself continue to be so misogynistic. I felt like I was failing. I so deeply wanted to please the adults in my life, but I couldn’t. The more I “failed,” the more depressed I got. What was so deeply broken inside me that I couldn’t accept myself? What was I doing wrong?

It was the “therapist” who was wrong. Jues continues:

I threw myself into an excruciating period of trying to dress and behave hyper-femininely. I had absolutely no self-worth. I ended up in abusive relationship after abusive relationship because I legitimately believed I deserved to be treated badly….

Society punishes trans women for displaying any sign of femininity and rates of violence against trans women are high. People will accept masculine traits in people assigned female at birth, but you have to identify as female. There’s a line. If you cross it and say, “I’m actually a man,” then the message is, “How dare you try to take a privilege that doesn’t belong to you?” I bought into it.

That cycle continued until 2011, when, at 35, he came out to his partner:

He was the first boyfriend to accept me, and his support and love helped me come out publicly and change my name and gender marker. Last year, we updated our marriage certificate with my proper gender marker, and our relationship was recognized legally as a same-sex marriage.

If it had not been for that transphobic “therapist”, Jules might have been accepted much  earlier.

Many countries have banned conversion therapy. More are in the process of doing so. Good!

image
image

Map on conversion therapy bans from Wikipedia.

Top photo of Jules Sherred; Francesca Roh/Xtra

Jules on twitter.

Trans women are not “socialized male”, they are “socialized trans”

image

Theresa Jean Tanenbaum argues that saying that trans women are socialized as men is wrong:

Growing up as a trans girl is like being gaslit by the whole world and still finding the strength and confidence to say “No! THIS is who I am!” 

After all, no other girls are subjected to the same degree of toxic masculinity as trans girls. No other girls are forced into boys locker rooms, or men’s restrooms, or all-male prep schools. No other girls are told to “man up!” or “don’t be a sissy”. 

No other girls are asked to prove they are girls again and again, by people who can’t themselves clearly explain what standard of proof they require, short of direct inspection of their genitals.

…When we express discomfort with the bullying we frequently experience at the hands of boys, we’re told that “that’s just how boys are” so we’d better get used to it. 

My failure to properly participate in male tribal behaviors made me a target for male aggression throughout my childhood. Boys who had been taught to “never hit a girl” had no problem starting a fight with someone they perceived as a boy, who acted, talked, and responded like a girl.

Sure, I suppose you could argue that this brutal oppression is caused by girls being forced to live as boys. So “they are socialized as men”. However, as soon as you see that all this violence is caused by them breaking the rules of a “real men don’t cry” culture, and that they are actually seen as something else than a “real boy”, it becomes clear that they are not socialized as men. They are disciplined for being gender variant.

“My “socialization” wasn’t the same as a cis girl, but it wasn’t anything like a boy’s,” Tanebaum writes:

I’d like to see the people who push the “trans women are socialized male” argument spend a day living the way I have lived my whole life. I wish the women who fancy themselves radical feminists valued womanhood enough to protect their trans sisters who have had to endure such unimaginable pain in order to be acknowledged women.

More here!

Photo: “The Ghost of Genders Past” — an unintentional collaboration between Tanebaum  and her smartphone’s memory card.

Pete Davidson calls out J.K. Rowling for her transphobic comments on Saturday Night Live

image

Pete Davidson spoke out against author J.K. Rowling’s problematic comments about transgender people on this week’s episode of “Saturday Night Live.”

Insider reports:

On “Weekend Update,” a popular recurring segment on NBC’s “Saturday Night Live,” the 26-year-old comedian responded to Rowling’s comments, saying he was “very disappointed.”

Here are some essential quotes:

“I long for a few young years ago when the worst things she did were those ‘Fantastic Beasts’ movies. No discrimination there, they harmed us all equally.”

“I think I am never getting another tattoo for the rest of my life. Don’t get tattoos! I got a Harry Potter tattoo years ago, because I am not psychic. I didn’t know J.K. Rowling was going all Mel Gibson on us! 

“I have a Game of Thrones tattoo, and now I am terrified one day George R.R. Martin is going to be like ‘Hey, if you enjoyed what I had to say dragon and dire wolves, wait till you hear what I think about Puerto Ricans!’“

“She creates a seven-book fantasy series about all types of mythical creatures living in harmony with wizards and elves and the one thing she can’t wrap her head around is Laverne Cox? She’s a national treasure!”

Yes, she is!

Americans can watch the segment here.

image
Load More