137 posts tagged TERFs

Tracing the Roots of Pop Culture Transphobia

image

Movie reviewer and YouTube star Lindsay Ellis has made a very interesting video on the  presentation of trans people (or, rather, people who are not really trans, but appears to be to uninformed cis people) in movies and media.

The main focus is on “the dangerous man in drag”  cliche, the crossdressing mad murderer. Think Psycho or The Silence of the Lamb.

This “mad, deceptive, man in women’s spaces” trope leads straight up to  J.K. Rowling’s latest book Troubled Blood (which she has published under the male pen name Robert Galbraith). Ellis proves that the book is not only transphobic. It is also full of fat shaming and harassment of poor people.

The art and movie analysis starts at 12:47.

The video contains some triggering scenes.

Lesbian Baroness, Elizabeth Jean Barker, debunks transphobic arguments in powerful speech

image

Pink News reports on the speech of the lesbian British peer, Baroness Parker, in defense of an inclusive Maternity Bill. She used the opportunity to tell her peer’s the truth about transphobia.

A Labour politician, Lord Hunt, has used the House of Lords to rage against the trans-inclusive language found in the proposal.

Parker is a Liberal Democrat.

According to Pink New the baroness said this in the House of Lords (the upper chamber of parliament):

“The classic campaign identifies a minority group, preferably one about which the majority population knows little, ascribes to them characteristics and motivations which make them a threat, repeats those assertions, preferably with the backing of a neutral body of experts, over and over until they become received wisdom. It’s what happened to migrant communities in the UK in the 1970s, and in the 1980s it was lesbians and gay men. Today, it’s the turn of trans people.“

“They [the alt-right] support campaign groups and individual academics to produce those documents which look like research, but under closer inspection, they’re just the same dodgy dossiers as in the past.”

“If you closely examine [Lord Hunt’s] speech, there is no actual evidence of any threat by trans people to individual women or women’s rights. It’s just an opinion, admittedly widely repeated”

"As a woman who lived through Section 28 [Margaret Thatcher’s homophobic legislation], I know what it’s like to be portrayed as a member of a group that constitutes a threat to women and children and families.”

“[It was] unsafe to let us [lesbians] into changing rooms because we pose a threat – all without evidence. That was an expression of classic homophobia, often expressed in the exact same arguments and phrases we’re hearing today. The effect of what you’re proposing is the same.”

Baroness Barker also talked about “gender-critical” trans-exclusionary feminists who are now supporting Hunt’s anti-trans amendment. She ridiculed their refrain of being “silenced” by the media, which is repeated by that same media “week in, week out”.

“They’re not being silenced, it’s just that some of us have the temerity to disagree with them, and to call them out for what they’re doing.”

Bravo, baroness, bravo!

Official portrait of Baroness Barker by Roger Harris

US survey shows the number  of LGBT+ people is increasing dramatically (and trans people are clearly not erasing lesbians…)

image

5.6% OF AMERICANS SEE THEMSELVES AS LGBT

A brand new survey published by Gallup in the US shows that there is a big increase in the number of Americans that see themselves as LGBT+. This applies to the number bisexual, gay, trans and lesbian people.

image

LGBT identification is now 5.6% among US adults in general. The current estimate is up from 4.5% in Gallup’s previous update based on 2017 data. The number for 2012 was 3.5%.

LGBT identification is lower in each older generation, including 2% or less of Americans born before 1965 (aged 56 and older in 2020). 

This is the first time Gallup has asked detailed questions about how LGBT people identify. This means that we have to compare the answers given by people from different generations to see if there has been any shifts as regards their specific sexual orientation and/or gender identity. 

Some take aways from the survey:

The biggest cross-generational increase is found in the percentage who experience themselves as bisexual: Baby Boomers: 0.3% vs. Gen Z: 11.5%. Women are more likely to think of themselves as bisexual than men, which may explain why we find a higher percentage of gay men compared to lesbian women in the LGBT+ community.

There is also an increase in the percentage that see themselves as gay, although not as big: Baby Boomers: 1.2% vs. Gen Z: 2.1%.

The percentage of trans people is also much higher in the younger cohorts (0.2% vs. 1.8%), but this has clearly not led to a decline in the percentage of lesbians (in spite of what some “gender critical feminists”  would like you to believe). There is actually a much higher percentage of the youngest adults who identify as lesbian, when compared to the older generations: Baby Boomers 0.4% vs. Gen Z 1.4%.

What I read out of this survey is that the increasing openness towards – and visibility of – LGBT+ people, makes it easier for people to see themselves as some shade of queer or trans, and to come out as such. That is great news for all LGBTQA+ people as well as  for the community as a whole.

More about the survey here.


Photo: FG Trade

Lesbians support transgender people

image

Lesbian trans-exclusionary “radical feminists” are claiming that transgender culture is erasing lesbian identities. Given all the noise they make, you may get the impression that most lesbians share their beliefs. This is not true.

In fact, my own experience from Norway tells me that most lesbians embrace the T in LGBTQA, and see that transgender people and lesbians face the same kind of oppression: Attacks from reactionary people who believe the cisgender/heterosexual gender norm should apply to everyone.

The lesbian erasure narrative

Over at Advocate the lesbian writer Sarah Fonseca (photo above) takes a look at Abigail Shrier’s transphobic book  Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters, and touches upon the the “lesbians are going extinct” narrative.

She writes:

Naturally, the assertion of Shrier that lesbians, tomboys, and lesbian tomboys are going the way of the dodo bird seeks to create pandemonium among queer girls who identify as such. 

And Irreversible Damage dares to inflict this very damage at a critical moment when lesbian social spaces that weren’t already shuttered are suffering due to national lockdown, and our community’s women — sociable, tactful, and independent of others’ transitions — are left to their own devices…

As a lesbian reader of sound gender, I still find it enormously unpleasant to be repeatedly told that I do not exist or that my gender and sexuality will inevitably shift, all because of a societal trend and its societal pressures; it is all too reminiscent of the comments foisted upon many of us by heterosexuals upon coming out. 

Fortunately, Shrier lacks two pieces of vital information. First, the lesbian is the mistress of silently and confidently auditing her own gender. She continues to exist because she abides by no one’s stringent rules…

We are hardly obsolete. If anything, we are just getting started. Our first mission? Disavowing Irreversible Damage. Our second? Taking care of our trans siblings. Our third? Reversing the damage that Shrier has done to lesbian reputation. The fourth? I do not know, but I hope it involves dancing and queers of every stripe, imagined and yet to be.

Abigail Shrier, who is a privileged white, straight and cis woman, is using the lesbian extinction scare to create a split in the queer community, not because she care about lesbians.

Enriched by trans people

In an article in the British Independent, Carrie Lyell puts it this way:

I don’t recall a plethora of columns offering solidarity from heterosexual “feminists” before so many latched on to lesbians as a way to push their agenda on trans issues. There was no faux-concern from our “straight allies” on any of those occasions, no calls to celebrate my swashbuckling swagger. Straight women were often the first to tell me to grow my hair, shave my legs or be more “ladylike”.

Instead I found comfort in the LGBT+ community and learnt resilience from those around me. While the world tried to box me in and crush my queer spirit, I was lifted up by lesbians, gay men, bi people and, yes, trans people.

image

Lyell (photo from twitter above) is the  editor of DIVA, a queer magazine. She writes that she has never met a trans person who has tried to convert her.

“Not for one minute have I felt erased by trans people,” she writes:  “If anything, I feel enriched.”

The great majority of lesbians feel this kind of kinship with trans people, and support them.

They used the same tactics against lesbians

In another article Fonseca points out the similarities found in the way the cis/heterosexual majority used to invalidate and attack lesbian women:

Queers and trans people have historically witnessed our bodies be weaponized in pursuit of the same old Cis American Dream by those on both sides of the political divide. 

In the sensational Women’s Lib text The Feminine Mystique, Betty Friedan was quick to distance herself and her movement from lesbians, writing them off as “disruptors” and members of “extreme left groups.” …

Unsympathetic to lesbian concerns about child custody and sexual liberation, she referred to the burgeoning group of dykes seeking representation in the larger women’s movement “the lavender menace.”

The same tactics were used against gay men and lesbian women as the TERFs are using now: the sexual predator tropé, the mental illness narrative and the “stupid people seduced by extremists” invalidation.

All the leading lesbian magazines support the trans community

Remember that back in 2018  the world’s leading publications for lesbians came  together to send a message of support and solidarity to the trans community. They wrote:

DIVA, Curve, Autostraddle, LOTL, Tagg, Lez Spread The Word, DapperQ, GO Magazine and LezWatch.TV believe that trans women are women and that trans people belong in our community. We do not think supporting trans women erases our lesbian identities; rather we are enriched by trans friends and lovers, parents, children, colleagues and siblings.

We strongly condemn writers and editors who seek to foster division and hate within the LGBTQI community with trans misogynistic content, and who believe “lesbian” is an identity for them alone to define. We condemn male-owned media companies who profit from the traffic generated by these controversies.

We also strongly condemn the current narrative peddled by some feminists, painting trans people as bullies and aggressors – one which reinforces transphobia and which must be challenged so that feminism can move forward.

We are really concerned about the message these so-called lesbian publications are sending to trans women and to young lesbians – including trans lesbians – and we want to make in clear this is not in our name.

Photo of Sarah Fonseca from Posture Mag.

See also: “Lesbians Turning On Elliot Page Is Not An Isolated Event, And We Need To Talk About It.”

JK Rowling and anti-trans rhetoric have caused ‘significant damage’ to the UK LGBTQI community, international report says

image

Britain is no longer one of the leading nations on the LGBTQI ranking of  ILGA-Europe.

ILGA is the acronym for the European Region of the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association. It is also known as Rainbow Europe. The rankings are based on how the laws and policies of each country impact on the lives of LGBTI people.

This year’s report explains:

Anti-trans rhetoric continued to cause serious damage in the UK again this year. A prime example is repeated transphobic attacks by author J.K. Rowling, on Twitter and in her writing. Her statements have been harshly criticised by trans people, activists and writers. A growing number of celebrities, including from “Harry Potter” films, have spoken out in support of trans communities. 

The report points to the conflict in the British newspaper The Guardian, attacks against LGBTQA friendly schools and the debate around The Scottish Government’s Hate Crime and Public Order Bill as examples of the increasing intolerance found in Britain.

In October, the Home Office published its annual Hate Crime statistics, finding a continued increase in hate crime cases as compared to the previous year, with sexual orientation based hate crimes increasing the most (19%) and anti-trans hate crimes second most (16%).

They also refer to  the England and Wales’s High Court which  ruled that young people under 16 are unlikely to be capable of consenting to hormone blockers, and the fact that the legal gender recognition reform continues to be delayed.

Malta remains best in class in Europe. As ILGA points out, The FRA LGBTI Survey II found that LGBTQI respondents in Malta had the lowest reported rate of threats and violence in the EU. The country has probably the most LGBTQA friendly policies in Europe.

image

The Rainbow Europe country ranking. The colour assigned to each country gives you an indication of where the countries are positioned on a scale between 0% (gross violations of human rights, discrimination) and 100% (respect of human rights, full equality).

See also Pink News: JK Rowling and anti-trans rhetoric have caused ‘significant damage’ to the UK, international LGBT+ report warns.

Anti-trans writer barred from Twitter for calling trans women men loses court battle to overturn ban

image

Pink News reports on Meghan Murphy,  editor of a trans-exclusionary feminist website, has lost a court bid to overturn her Twitter ban over posts repeatedly referring to transgender women as men:

In a 42-page opinion dated 22 January, California’s First District Appellate Court upheld a decision to dismiss a lawsuit from Murphy, finding that Twitter was well within its rights to issue bans for violating policies on hateful conduct.

The court argued that as a private company, Twitter is free to enforce its own terms of service as it chooses.

Tech Dirt writes:

Murphy’s lawsuit is dead, at least in this court. Twitter’s motion to demurrer is granted “without leave to amend,” which indicates this complaint isn’t fixable. This doesn’t prevent Murphy from trying again at the federal level, but the outcome won’t be any different.

Good!

Photo from Pink News (Getty/Rick Madonik)

No, lesbians are not being erased

Transhealthnow shared an interesting graph yesterday over at twitter. 

image

They write:

Baby boomers: “Lesbians are an endangered species”
The survey says: “Gen Z is 46% queer”

This Ipsos MORI survey (which is from Britain) tells the story of an amazing shift in attitudes towards queer people, including those gay, lesbian, bi, transgender or nonbinary (+!). Close to half of Gen Z’ers are now essentially some shade of queer.

And yes, the increasing acceptance of trans people is part of this picture, but not as a threat to lesbians. Quite the opposite: What we seeing here is an increasing tolerance of broad spectrums of sexuality and gender variance.

But here’s the thing: The lesbian TERF’s are clearly part of the old belief system, the one where the establishment tries to police the sexuality and gender of others. They are therefore a real threat to LGBTQA people of all shades and colors, lesbians included.

Transphobes think trans men are trans women. But of course!

image

It must be difficult to be a transphobe. It is soooo hard for them to wrap their narrow minds around the concept of gender. 

Here’s one example: 

Luteal, a company selling products to promote menstrual health and symptom relief, launched a campaign  last month featuring trans men and transmasculine nonbinary persons.

As an unintended trans affirmative gesture a lot of transphobes  confirmed their identity, falsely believing the models to be “Biological men cosplaying as women!”.

“Why do all these men so desperately want to be women?” A Facebook user asked.

Phaylen Fairchild writes:

The founder of Luteal, Alexa Perry, a queer, non-binary person themself, made it clear in their statement that the focus of the effort is to resist minimizing and normalizing the pain presented by those who experience menstruation and instead listening with compassion, understanding and awareness. It reads;

“It is for this reason that I feel a deep obligation to honouring the gift of this knowledge by including queer and trans people in everything we do. Our People Have Periods campaign is our way of capturing and sharing these gifts with the world. Each and everyone of the people in this campaign have forged their own reality. They dared to imagine a world full of love and celebration. So we join them today in celebrating all of the possibility for change in a world that so desperately needs it. We celebrate this by showing up. With minds and hearts wide open.” — Alexa Perry, Luteal.com founder

More here.

Luteal web site.

White Tears, White Rage – the Roots of “Gender Critical” & Transphobic Feminism

image

Here’s an article about modern white feminism that deserves your attention: “White tears, white rage: Victimhood and (as) violence in mainstream feminism,” by Alison Phipps.

I m not sure Phipps’ criticism always hit the right targets. For instance: Her text may sometimes give you the impression that nearly all white feminists are reactionary and violent  (although I do no think this is her intention – Phipps is herself white). That is not the case. But her discussion of white privilege anchored in a patriarchal, colonial and racist past makes very much sense to me – unfortunately.

Paragraphs like the following will be recognizable to most transgender and nonbinary people:

Reactionary feminisms, which coalesce around debates about sex workers’ rights and transgender equality, magnify the political whiteness of the mainstream and deliberately withhold womanhood and personhood from marginalised Others. 

Trans women are defined as ‘biological men’ while trans-exclusionary feminists are ‘adult human females’. Sex workers’ rights are juxtaposed with ‘women’s safety’, a manoeuvre in which the womanhood of sex workers is implicitly denied. 

This reasserts the normative economically productive body and reproductive sex. It conjures up colonial sex difference and bourgeois white womanhood as a symbol of moral order, set against the racialised and enslaved inhabitants of colonised and settled territories and the multi-racial, ‘dangerous, immoral, and libidinal lower classes’ of the metropolis (Tyler, 2008: 22). 

In this mentality, neither the ‘unnatural’ or the ‘unrespectable’ woman can ever be a real woman (Phipps, 2020: 151). (…)

Trans-exclusionary (or ‘gender-critical’) feminism similarly relies on accounts of sexual victimisation, set alongside a construction of trans women as predatory and essentially male. This pertains to discussions about trans women’s inclusion in women’s services and other spaces such as prisons, toilets and changing rooms (Serano, 2013: 31). 

Trans women are made responsible for acts of violence committed by cis men, through narratives that naturalise the penis as violence and stick this organ to the trans woman via an intrusive and violent obsession with her surgical status (Phipps, 2016: 311). 

Simultaneously (like other reactionary politics), trans-exclusionary feminism monsters trans women in general through publicising isolated incidents of violence committed by members of this group. The effect of both tactics is to repackage trans equality as predation: trans women’s demands to be recognised as women are reinterpreted as invasion and sexual threat.

This reactionary feminist politics exemplifies the threatened bourgeois femininity of political whiteness. This is magnified in claims to be silenced and oppressed, which have been made by reactionary feminists (or men speaking on their behalf) in high-profile media outlets (Phipps, 2020: 150). 

The narrative – that reactionary feminists are the real victims but their voices are not being heard – achieves several aims. It disseminates reactionary feminist ideas; it deploys Strategic White Womanhood to avoid accountability; it uses the device of white women’s tears to deny humanity to the Other. 

Reactionary feminists seize womanhood – and personhood – while sex workers become uncaring ‘happy hookers’ and trans women become shadowy threats. We see the weeping Madonna versus the unfeeling whore. We see the weeping survivor versus the menacing predator. Neither sex workers or trans women are entitled to complex feelings or to claim victimisation on their own behalf.

Read the whole paper here!

Alison Phipps is a Professor of Gender Studies at The University of Sussex in Britain. She has been a scholar-activist in the movement against sexual violence for the past fifteen years. She is the author of the book Me, not you The trouble with mainstream feminism

See also: Genders, Bodies, Poliics, Alison Phipps’ site

What the TV series “It’s a Sin” tells us about the tactics of anti-trans activists today

image

Over at Twitter Owen Jones reflects on the way the history of bigotry is repeating. The new British TV series It’s a Sin reminds him of how the tactics once used against gay and lesbian people is now used against trans and nonbinary folks.

Owen Peter Jones is a British newspaper columnist, commentator, journalist and political activist. 

It’s a Sin is a British television drama serial written and created by Russell T Davies. It is about the queer community in the 1980′s London.

image
image

Owen writes:

One of the most important themes in ‘It’s A Sin’ was about gay/bi people and shame - caused by growing up in a society that saw gay/bi people as would-be sexual predators, violators of biological reality, threats to children, immoral, deviants, and generally undesirable.

While HIV rates remain significantly higher among gay and bisexual men, treatments now allow those with HIV to live healthy lives. Alcohol and drug abuse as a response to shame and trauma caused by homophobia is today a bigger problem in Western nations.

It’s important to make this point because the evidence suggests that mental distress is even more acute amongst trans people, who are today the most marginalised and oppressed part of the LGBTQ+ world.

Anti-trans activists use the same arguments as the homophobes

Today, anti-trans activists play the exact same songs about trans people: that they are would-be sexual predators, violators of biological reality, threats to children, immoral, deviants, and generally undesirable.

Some of those anti-trans activists responded viscerally to being called out for enjoying It’s A Sin. They are furious at being compared to the monsters who victimised gay people, even as they obsessively target trans people in the same papers that obsessively targeted gay people.

Some of them point to their past association with pro-gay struggles, or in some cases simply that they have been to gay bars before, as though any of this gives them a lifetime freedom pass to say whatever they like about other minorities.

But as It’s A Sin shows, a society which made gay people feel unwelcome - as burdens at best and as menaces at worst - inflicts terrible damage on gay people. The same is being done to trans people.

However those who, in some cases, spend a genuinely huge amount of their lives talking about trans people as would-be predators or threats to children justify it to themselves, they are inflicting the same injuries on trans people as It’s A Sin underlined is done to gay people.

The quadrupling of transphobic hate crimes, the 48% of trans people who fear using public toilets, the trans people discriminated against at work, the quarter who’ve suffered homelessness, all of this is erased from the “conversation”, such as it is.

Even the focus on contexts which don’t affect 99.9% of trans people - but which are used to attack all of them - namely prisons and sports deliberately excludes questions like 'Why are there no trans Olympic medallists?’ or 'How do we stop trans prisoners being assaulted?’

Inflicting the same damage

The hounders of trans people may hate It’s A Sin being used to hand them a mirror. But the anti-trans faction, who operate strikingly like a cult, are not only singing the same tunes - they are inflicting the exact same damage on trans people as gay people have long suffered.

oh and I’ve set this so only people who follow me can reply because, although anti-trans activists have made a conscious decision to relentlessly and obsessively target me, and I can live with that, I don’t want trans people to have to sift through their bile.

“Gender critical” parents who are harming their kids

Some other thoughts. 

 One of the most powerful themes towards the end of It’s A Sin is Ritchie’s mother being confronted by Jill for the damage she inflicted on her gay son, suggesting that the shame she instilled in him helped drive behaviour that led to his infection with HIV.

“Actually it is your fault, Mrs Tozer,” says Jill. “All of this is your fault."  Jill adds: "The wards are full of men who think they deserve it.”

She was right. So many of the gay and bisexual men who died often lonely deaths in hospital wards were traumatised by their parents.

Today, most gay people have gay friends who have mental trauma which often leads to alcohol and drug abuse with absolutely catastrophic consequences. Many, all too many, have had friends who’ve died from suicide. The culprits? Society in general but often parents in particular.

It’s A Sin showcased the LGBTQ family, of other LGBTQ friends filling a vacuum left by the absence of a loving family. A big role of that 'family’ is to pick up the pieces because of the damage inflicted by parents on their children.

When parents refuse to properly accept their LGBTQ children for who they are, they insert ticking time bombs in many of them. That bomb may detonate in their 20s, their 30s, their 40s, who knows, maybe in their 50s or 60s. But in many of them, it will detonate.

This is why there is a genuine horror watching self-described “gender critical” parents ranting about trans people on the internet. Because I can’t help but think, oh god, what if they have trans children. What damage will be inflicted upon them.

In some cases, the bigotry of anti-trans activists - often radicalised by newspaper columnists, online rabbit holes, and somewhat perversely, Mumsnet - will collide with reality. Read this about an ex-'gender critical’ activist and their trans nephew.

But in other cases, transphobic parents will stick determinedly to their guns and inflict the same damage on their trans children as homophobic parents have always inflicted on their gay children. We should be clear: homophobia and transphobia are forms of child abuse.

Hiding behind the argument of protecting their children

Both traditional homophobes and contemporary transphobes claimed they were protecting the welfare of children. As anti-gay campaigner Anita Bryant declared: “As a mother, I know that homosexuals cannot biologically reproduce children; therefore, they must recruit our children”.

Today’s anti-trans activists use the language of 'safeguarding’ and often suggest that parents know what’s best for their children. This is clearly not always the case. Lots of children need to be protected from their parents. That includes many LGBTQ children.

So when this Times journalist attacked Mermaids, a charity supporting young trans people, for including an 'exit button’, suggesting it was 'a major safeguarding breach’. Many LGBTQ children don’t have supportive parents and need to hide their identity away from them.

image

Anti-trans rhetoric echoes anti-gay arguments

Anti-gay rights campaigners long focused on the danger posed by predatory gay men to vulnerable children, and pointed to scandals in, for example, the Scouts and the Catholic Church as evidence. Today, anti-trans activists similarly extrapolate extreme cases to make their case.

In the 1980s, it was claimed an all-powerful gay lobby was putting political correctness ahead of people’s well-being. The same language is used about the objectively marginalised trans minority today. The second screenshot is from this weekend’s Times newspaper.

That’s why so many gay people stand up for trans people. Trans people, of course, are in our shared LGBTQ spaces, and their experiences do differ in important ways - but we see them going through the exact same things we’ve gone through.

It is, frankly, grotesque that gay people who for very obvious reasons stand with their trans siblings are then vilified as misogynists, or have obvious homophobic tropes about wanting to endanger children’s safety thrown at them.

It’s also perverse that many of the same people publicly cooing over It’s A Sin are the same people trying to hound the LGBTQ allies of trans people out of the media (they can’t really do this to trans people because there are very few trans people in the media).

LGB people attacking trans people

As for the LGB people who participate in the hounding of trans people. There have long been examples of oppressed groups who participate in oppression, often against themselves: women against the Equal Rights Amendment and feminism, right-wing black Republicans, and so on.

These anti-trans LGB activists are not only completely unrepresentative of LGBTQ people: many queer bars and spaces bar people who express their bigoted opinions for very obvious reasons: to ensure they’re safe spaces for the whole LGBTQ rainbow.

Watching straight people try and foment a civil war within the LGBTQ world by platforming these completely marginal bigoted zealots is actually completely and utterly grotesque.

Finally (!) in the 1980s, almost the whole media was anti-gay, and public opinion was overwhelmingly anti-gay. Today, almost the whole media is anti-trans, but while transphobia is rampant, anti-trans sentiment is not as widespread as anti-gay sentiment back then. There’s hope!

But it takes huge courage to speak out in support of trans people in Britain in 2021. One day, there will be TV programmes about the onslaught against trans people. Those who victimised trans people today will be portrayed in them. They’ll go down in history as hate figures.

Sadly, it’s too late to save all too many LGBTQ people who had ticking time bombs inserted into them both by society and by their homophobic and transphobic parents. They detonated. But we can save others from that fate. So speak up.

Read the whole thread with other comments here!

Read also Michael Cashman: Loss and anger raged in me after watching It’s a Sin – the stigma we faced in the 1980s is now being directed at trans people

Photo of Owen Jones: Antonio Olmos/The Observer

Load More